ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Mobile-based Assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities in Urology Training: Implementation and Outcomes.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Entrustable professional activities in medical education: strategies and results - a systematic review.Medical education online · 2026Pooled it
- Structured Feedback Tools in Surgical Training: Results of the Endo-Workshop of the German Society of Residents in Urology 2024.Urologia internationalis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Urology residency programs often lack consistent feedback mechanisms and tracking of an individual's progress. Competency-based medical education, using entrustable professional activities (EPAs), offers a solution but faces challenges in implementation. The aim of this study was to implement and assess a smartphone application for real-time EPA assessments in urology residency programs. Methods: A mobile application was introduced to 13 urology residents and ten supervisors at a Swiss training institution. Assessment characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Agreement between trainees and supervisors on task complexity and supervision levels was evaluated using Cohen's and Fleiss' κ metrics. Key findings and limitations: Over a period of 7 mo, 246 EPA assessments were recorded, of which 214 assessments were completed, representing a completion rate of 86%. Procedural EPAs accounted for 92% of the assessments, and nonprocedural EPAs for 8%. Cohen's κ indicated moderate agreement for task complexity (κ = 0.56) and supervision levels (κ = 0.55). Higher agreement was observed when trainees were rated competent in supervising others (κ = 0.71). Limitations include the focus on procedural tasks and the small sample size. Conclusions and clinical implications: A mobile application can effectively facilitate real-time EPA assessments in urology training, promoting frequent feedback conversations and efficient tracking of resident progress. However, greater emphasis on nonprocedural EPAs is needed. Patient summary: We tested a mobile phone app that provides real-time feedback to urology residents and found that it enhanced their training experience. While the app effectively tracks progress in carrying out procedures, more focus is needed on developing nonprocedural skills such as patient counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.