Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060301›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Lobbying, transparency and trust: power imbalances and the failure to implement Europe's Beating Cancer Plan.

Amandine Garde, Nikhil Gokani, Juan Collado Perez-Llantada, Jaydon Souter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amandine GardeSchool of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Nikhil GokaniEssex Law School, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Juan Collado Perez-LlantadaSchool of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jaydon SouterSchool of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Prevention Pillar of Europe's Beating Cancer Plan (EBCP), the European Commission made a series of commitments to promote better health for all, including proposals for new legislation on food and alcohol labelling. However, the implementation of these commitments has been paralysed. In this Viewpoint, we argue that this paralysis stems, in part at least, from insufficient incorporation of the principles of transparency and openness, which promote the accountability of policy actors through citizens' participation in the legislative process. This has led to a twofold problem: 1) the misplaced belief in the contribution that self-regulation can make to the promotion of healthier environments; and 2) the failure to adopt effective legally binding measures to regulate the commercial determinants of health, as the failure to publish the suite of legislative proposals promised in the EBCP epitomises.

Indexed as

Commercial determinants of healthEuropean Union (EU)LobbyingNon-communicable diseases (NCDs)Power imbalancesTransparencyTrust

Identifiers

PMID40060301
PMCPMC11889614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.