ArticleIranian journal of pathology2025
Comparison of Diagnostic Methods in Patients with Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Women Infected with Multiple High-Risk Human Papillomaviruses.
Article in Iranian journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Objective: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a major cause of cervical cancer and mortality, particularly in low-income countries. Late diagnosis of cervical cancer often leads to advanced-stage disease, resulting in poorer prognosis and higher mortality, which underscores the critical need for effective early screening methods. Pap smears, colposcopy, and HPV testing are essential for early detection. This study addresses a gap in the literature by comparing the effectiveness of different diagnostic methods specifically in women with multiple high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infections-a population for which limited comparative data exist. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study, approved by the Ethical Committee of Qazvin University (IR.QUMS.REC.1400.143), was conducted at Kowsar Hospital from 2022 to 2023 and included 608 patients infected with multiple hrHPV subtypes. Inclusion criteria required hrHPV confirmation by PCR genotyping and excluded patients without colposcopy and biopsy or with a history of cervical dysplasia. Participants underwent Pap smear cytology, colposcopy, and biopsy, with the biopsy specimens examined by a gynecologic pathologist. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests for qualitative variables and t-tests or ANOVA for quantitative variables, with a significance level set at P<0.05. Results: The average age of the patients was 38.54 years, with the majority aged 30-39 years (43.6%). Common symptoms included vaginal discharge (36.5%) and postcoital bleeding (34.9%). Pap smear results showed ASCUS in 43.6% of cases and LSIL in 39.1%. Colposcopy revealed acetowhite lesions in 45.6% and abnormal vascular patterns in 25.5%. Histopathology indicated that 72.4% of patients had CIN I. Smoking was significantly correlated with colposcopic findings (P=0.044). Colposcopy demonstrated the highest sensitivity (69.1%) for detecting cervical lesions, while cytology had the highest specificity (63.1%). Conclusion: Pap smear findings provide adequate diagnostic accuracy for hrHPV patients, but colposcopy offers superior sensitivity for detecting cervical lesions. Combining both methods is recommended to improve diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.