Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060212›Full record

ArticleCJC open2025

Implications of Inaccurate Blood Pressure Measurement on Hypertension Prevalence.

Alexander A Leung, Swapnil Hiremath, Jeanne V A Williams, Ross T Tsuyuki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander A LeungDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Swapnil HiremathDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jeanne V A WilliamsDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ross T TsuyukiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The cornerstone of the management of hypertension is accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP). A recent study showed that more than one-half of home BP devices sold in Canada have no evidence of validation for accuracy. The purpose of this study was to model the implications of inaccurate BP measurements on diagnosis and control of hypertension. Methods: We used data from the Canadian Health Measures Survey to model the effects of inaccurate BP devices by 5 or 10 mm Hg over or under the true BP value. Hypertension was defined as BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg (or ≥130/80 mm Hg in those patients with diabetes). Results: If both systolic and diastolic BP were overestimated by 10 mm Hg, the prevalence of hypertension would falsely increase by 50% to 63%, potentially leading to overtreatment of approximately 3.5 million Canadians. Conversely, the impact of underestimation of BP appeared minimal, but mostly because of design limitations of our study. Conclusions: We found that overestimation of BP by only 10 mm Hg could lead to overtreatment of up to 3.5 million Canadians. Government should mandate the validation of BP devices before they can be sold; until then, clinicians and patients should be cautious in their selection of BP devices, using the Hypertension Canada Recommended Device Program to guide selection.

Identifiers

PMID40060212
PMCPMC11886364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.