Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060165›Full record

ReviewBioscience2025

Imperiled Great Basin terminal lakes: Synthesizing ecological and hydrological science gaps and research needs for waterbird conservation.

Garth Herring, Ashley L Whipple, Cameron L Aldridge, Bryce A Pulver, Collin A Eagles-Smith, Rich D Inman, Elliott L Matchett, Adrian P Monroe, Elizabeth K Orning, Benjamin S Robb and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Garth HerringUS Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1106-4731
Ashley L WhippleUS Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Cameron L AldridgeUS Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Bryce A PulverUS Geological Survey, Utah Water Science Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Collin A Eagles-SmithUS Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon, United States.
Rich D InmanUS Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Elliott L MatchettUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Science Center, Dixon, California, United States.
Adrian P MonroeUS Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Elizabeth K OrningUS Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Benjamin S RobbUS Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Jessica E ShyversUS Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Bryan C TarboxUS Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Nathan D Van SchmidtUS Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Cassandra D SmithUS Geological Survey, Oregon Water Science Center, Bend, Oregon, United States.
Matthew J HolloranUS Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Cory T OvertonUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Science Center, Dixon, California, United States.
David R O'LearyUS Geological Survey, Utah Water Science Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Michael L CasazzaUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Science Center, Dixon, California, United States.
Rebecca J FrusUS Geological Survey, Nevada Water Science Center, Boulder City, Nevada, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terminal lakes are declining globally because of human water demands, drought, and climate change. Through literature synthesis and feedback from the resource and conservation community, we review the state of research for terminal lakes in the Great Basin of the United States, which support millions of waterbirds annually, to prioritize ecological and hydrologic information needs. From an ecological perspective, research priorities include measuring the underlying differences in waterbird resource selection and distribution, migratory connectivity, abiotic factors that interact with prey densities to affect prey availability, and waterbird fitness or demography. Integrated links between water availability, water quality, and food webs are lacking in the literature. Scarce water availability data hinder the current knowledge of water extraction and evapotranspiration rates. Research that can address these priorities would help advance our understanding of how the Great Basin terminal lakes function as an interrelated system and support conservation efforts to reverse the decline of these critical lakes.

Indexed as

endorheicmigratory connectivitysaline lakeswaterbirdswater extractionwater use

Identifiers

PMID40060165
PMCPMC11884798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.