Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060163›Full record

ArticleBioscience2025

Leveraging collective impact to characterize and identify solutions to cultural challenges within scientific societies.

Taylor Lightner, Simone Soso, Candice M Etson, Robin McC Greenler, Mercy Mugo, Verónica A Segarra

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Taylor LightnerLeveraging, Enhancing, Developing Biology Program, Research Coordination Network, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Simone SosoLeveraging, Enhancing, Developing Biology Program, Research Coordination Network, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Candice M EtsonLeveraging, Enhancing, Developing Biology Program, Research Coordination Network, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Robin McC GreenlerLeveraging, Enhancing, Developing Biology Program, Research Coordination Network, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Mercy MugoLeveraging, Enhancing, Developing Biology Program, Research Coordination Network, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Verónica A SegarraLeveraging, Enhancing, Developing Biology Program, Research Coordination Network, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6914-8271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A consortium of scientific societies recently identified challenges to inclusivity within the biology communities they represent. Specifically, societies encounter difficulties collecting member demographic data effectively, integrating scientists at transitional career stages, and diversifying their leadership. In response, the Leveraging, Enhancing, and Developing Biology (LED-BIO) research coordination network (NSF 2134725) organized two meetings at the Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, MA to gather stakeholders and employ top-down and bottom-up organizational approaches to address these challenges. These meetings included Town Hall and Think Tank events to facilitate open dialogue and gather feedback on policies and programs from national organizations in attendance. These discussions provided valuable insights into the barriers societies face and the available resources and interventions societies use to promote inclusivity. This article uses the LED-BIO research coordination network as a case study to discuss the Town Hall-Think Tank-Consensus Building (TTC) methodology for advancing inclusive excellence in scientific communities.

Indexed as

career transitionsculture changedemographic data collectioninclusive leadershipscientific societies

Identifiers

PMID40060163
PMCPMC11884808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.