ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Accurate volume image reconstruction for digital breast tomosynthesis with directional-gradient and pixel sparsity regularization.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving depth-resolution, in-plane contrast, and reducing non-uniformity artifacts for wide-angle DBT.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Introduction to the Special Issue: Celebrating Digital Tomosynthesis-Past, Present, and Future.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: We aim to develop accurate volumetric quantitative imaging of iodinated contrast agent (ICA) in contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Approach: The two main components of the approach are the use of a dual-energy DBT (DE-DBT) scan and the development of an optimization-based algorithm that can yield accurate images with isotropic resolution. The image reconstruction algorithm exploits sparsity in the subject's directional derivative magnitudes, and it also performs direct sparsity regularization to help confine the reconstruction to the true support of the subject. The algorithm is demonstrated with three sets of simulations in 2D and 3D, and a physical DE-DBT scan. The last of the three simulations employs an anthropomorphic phantom derived from the VICTRE project, testing quantitative tumor imaging with ICA. Results: The 2D simulations of the algorithm demonstrate accurate and stable image reconstruction. With the first 3D simulation, the proposed algorithm shows the ability to resolve overlapping objects, and with the anthropomorphic phantom, accurate recovery of the irregular ICA distribution in the shape of a tumor model is demonstrated. Applying the algorithm to DE-DBT transmission data of the CIRS BR3D phantom with solid ICA inserts yields images in which the depth-blurring is greatly reduced and the ICA distribution is accurately reconstructed. Conclusion: The results for the sparsity regularization algorithm applied to DE-DBT show promise, but as the algorithm performance is necessarily subject-dependent, further investigation using subjects with varying complexity in the ICA distribution is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.