Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060146›Full record

ReviewBioactive materials2025

Microgel-based bioink for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting and its applications in tissue engineering.

Keerthi Subramanian Iyer, Lei Bao, Jiali Zhai, Aparna Jayachandran, Rodney Luwor, Jiao Jiao Li, Haiyan Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Smart Bioinks for 4D Bioprinting: Requirements, Design, and Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Living Hydrogels: Harnessing Microorganism-Material Synergy for Next-Generation Therapeutics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keerthi Subramanian IyerSchool of Engineering, STEM College, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Lei BaoSchool of Engineering, STEM College, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Jiali ZhaiSchool of Science, STEM College, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Aparna JayachandranFiona Elsey Cancer Research Institute, 106 Lydiard Street South, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia.
Rodney LuworFiona Elsey Cancer Research Institute, 106 Lydiard Street South, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia.
Jiao Jiao LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Haiyan LiSchool of Engineering, STEM College, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrusion-based 3D bioprinting is being increasingly adopted as a versatile biofabrication method for making biomimetic constructs in tissue engineering. However, the lack of ideal bioinks continues to limit its broader application. Conventional hydrogel-based bioinks typically possess a densely crosslinked nanoporous structure that hinders their ability to fully support cell behavior. Microgel-based bioinks have recently emerged as a promising alternative due to their enhanced printability and functionality. This review will begin with the evolution of the "bioink" concept, followed by a discussion on bioink categories and the requirements of ideal bioinks. It will then introduce hydrogel-based bioinks and their limitations, followed by a definition of microgels and microgel-based bioinks and a discussion of their key properties, highlighting their differences compared to conventional hydrogel-based bioinks. Topics on microgel-based bioinks are then presented in order of the printing process: pre-printing (fabrication of microgels and formulation of microgel-based bioinks), during printing and post-printing (microgel assembly kinetics). Uniquely, this review will examine the various applications of microgel-based bioinks in tissue engineering, summarizing their advantages and limitations. Finally, the current challenges and future perspectives of using microgel-based bioinks are discussed. This review comprehensively examines microgel-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting, highlighting their potential to overcome current challenges and setting the stage for their future applications in creating complex, functional tissue engineering scaffolds.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingBioinkHydrogelsMicrogelsTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40060146
PMCPMC11889356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.