Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060141›Full record

ArticleBioactive materials2025

Primary and Re-exposure effects of D-enantiomeric peptide on metabolism, diversity, and composition of oral biofilms at different stages of recovery.

Mohamed Amhmed, Brandon Kieft, Abdullah Almegbel, Lari Häkkinen, Markus Haapasalo, He Liu, Ya Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohamed AmhmedDepartment of Oral Biological & Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Brandon KieftDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Abdullah AlmegbelDepartment of Oral Biological & Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Lari HäkkinenDepartment of Oral Biological & Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Markus HaapasaloDepartment of Oral Biological & Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
He LiuDepartment of Oral Biological & Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Ya ShenDepartment of Oral Biological & Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistence of bacteria in the root canal system is the primary cause of recurrent apical periodontitis. The adaptability of residual bacteria to changing environmental conditions is a key survival strategy of biofilms, often leading to endodontic treatment failure. DJK-5 is a protease-resistant, broad-spectrum D-enantiomeric peptide that degrades or prevents the accumulation of guanosine penta- and tetraphosphates, which are important for biofilm formation. We evaluated the effects of primary antimicrobial agents and nutrient conditions on the recovery, metabolism, diversity, and composition of oral biofilms, and investigated how these factors affect the efficacy of DJK-5 and chlorhexidine (CHX) during re-exposure. Primary irrigants and nutrient conditions significantly influenced biofilm recovery, metabolic activity, diversity, and composition. Biofilm recovery was slower in nutrient-poor groups compared to nutrient-rich ones, and nutrient availability had the greatest effect on shaping both the diversity and composition of the biofilms. Water and DJK-5 groups showed similar biofilm diversity trends, while CHX generally led to lower diversity. Results indicate that primary irrigants and nutrient conditions significantly impact biofilm composition, diversity, and recovery. However, these changes did not compromise DJK-5's effectiveness in killing of biofilm microbes during re-exposure of recovered biofilms.

Indexed as

DiversityDJK-5EndodonticsIrrigationMetabolismOral biofilm

Identifiers

PMID40060141
PMCPMC11889352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.