ArticleIndian journal of nephrology
Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors for Anemia in Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Article in Indian journal of nephrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating Desidustat's Efficacy and Safety in Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Anemia.American journal of nephrology · 2026Article
- Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors for Treatment of Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Guidelines for South Asia.Indian journal of nephrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are oral drugs for patients with renal anemia. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on HIF-PHIs for anemia in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (DD-CKD) patients. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases and trial registries for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting HIF-PHIs versus erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) for anemia in DD-CKD patients. Two authors independently conducted screening, data extraction, and assessed risk of bias. We used RevMan 5.3 software for meta-analysis using standard methods. Certainty of evidence was assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). We included 20 RCTs involving 14,999 patients with anemia of kidney disease. The studies included roxadustat (n = 9), daprodustat (n = 5), vadadustat (n = 2), molidustat (n = 2), enarodustat (n = 1), and desidustat (n = 1). Overall, daprodustat as an alternative to ESAs reported a substantial net benefit while roxadustat showed more damage than benefit as compared to ESAs. While other HIF inhibitors demonstrated little to no difference or small benefit, daprodustat reduces the need for intravenous iron supplementation up to 52 weeks as compared to ESAs [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.77 (95% CI 0.53-1.13); p = 0.18; two studies; 674 participants; moderate certainty evidence]. Roxadustat increased treatment-emergent adverse events up to 6-52 weeks as compared to ESAs [OR: 1.45 (95% CI 1.08-1.96); p = 0.01; six studies; 1715 participants; moderate certainty evidence]. The study provided evidence on the use of HIF-PHIs for treating renal anemia in DD-CKD patients as an alternative to ESAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.