ArticleIndian journal of nephrology
Comparison of Standard and Global Coagulation Tests in Hemodialysis Patients.
Article in Indian journal of nephrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased tendency of bleeding and thrombosis. There are multiple factors that interact with each other to cause either in CKD patients. Conventional or standard coagulation tests (SCT) have several limitations. Global coagulation test (GCT), such as Sonoclot, gives a real-time detailed analysis of coagulation status. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective observational cross-sectional study of 50 adult CKD stage 5D (dialysis) patients conducted from January 2020 to January 2022. Clinical details were noted and blood samples were taken for conventional and global coagulation tests prior to dialysis. Correlation between SCT and GCT as well as clinical hemostatic events was analyzed. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled. Bleeding and thrombosis occurred in 7 and 5 patients, respectively. There was a significant correlation between some SCT and GCT parameters. None of the SCT parameter derangement was associated with any thrombotic episodes except increased fibrinogen level which was associated with thrombotic events. On the contrary, patients with hypocoagulability according to SCT actually had thrombotic events. Parameters of GCT, such as clot rate, time to peak, and platelet function were significantly associated with thrombotic episodes. Conclusion: SCT and GCT parameters do not correlate with each other. SCT is not associated with clinically significant bleeding and thrombotic events. Some GCT parameters are associated with thrombotic events. GCT are real time and are better than SCT to reflect the coagulation status in patients on dialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.