ArticleResearch square2025
Postpartum women's prospective acceptability of long-acting HIV prevention approaches in Kenya: A qualitative study.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: New long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA-PrEP) options offer an alternative to daily oral PrEP, which poses difficulties for adherence, especially during pregnancy and postpartum. Yet, limited data exist on LA-PrEP acceptability among pregnant and postpartum women. We aimed to evaluate its acceptability and identify strategies to enhance it. Methods: We conducted an exploratory qualitative study with postpartum women in five public health facilities in Kisumu and Siaya Counties, Kenya. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with women expressing high, low, and mixed LA-PrEP interest throughout pregnancy and postpartum. Inductive and deductive content analysis was used, and themes of acceptability were explored using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Results: We conducted 70 IDIs with postpartum women between August 2023 and March 2024. The majority (62.9%) expressed consistently high interest in LA-PrEP. Most viewed LA-PrEP, especially every two-month injectables, as highly acceptable due to reduced pill burden, side effects, and dosing frequency. Concerns were raised regarding injectable PrEP safety for the baby during pregnancy and suitability of using the vaginal ring during delivery. Participants emphasized the importance of education on the safety of these methods during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and strategies for improving adherence, such as mobile reminders. Overall, women preferred LA-PrEP options over daily oral PrEP for convenience, effectiveness, and privacy, with healthcare provider education seen as crucial. Discussion: We found high acceptability of LA-PrEP options among postpartum women with experience taking PrEP during pregnancy. The findings reveal diverse preferences and key factors influencing acceptability, including safety, discretion, and convenience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.