Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060032›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Promoting active participation in robot-aided rehabilitation via machine learning and impedance control.

Christian Tamantini, Kevin Patrice Langlois, Joris de Winter, Parham Haji Ali Mohamadi, David Beckwée, Eva Swinnen, Tom Verstraten, Bram Vanderborght, Loredana Zollo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Automated planning and scheduling in robot-aided rehabilitation: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christian TamantiniResearch Unit of Advanced Robotics and Human-Centred Technologies, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Kevin Patrice LangloisRobotics and MultiBody Mechanics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Joris de WinterRobotics and MultiBody Mechanics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Parham Haji Ali MohamadiRobotics and MultiBody Mechanics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
David BeckwéeRehabilitation Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Eva SwinnenRehabilitation Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Tom VerstratenRobotics and MultiBody Mechanics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Bram VanderborghtRobotics and MultiBody Mechanics Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Loredana ZolloResearch Unit of Advanced Robotics and Human-Centred Technologies, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Active patient participation is crucial for effective robot-assisted rehabilitation. Quantifying the user's Active Level of Participation (ALP) during therapy and developing human-robot interaction strategies that promote engagement can improve rehabilitation outcomes. However, existing methods for estimating participation are often unimodal and do not provide continuous participation assessment. Methods: This study proposes a novel approach for estimating ALP during upper-limb robot-aided rehabilitation by leveraging machine learning within a multimodal framework. The system integrates pressure sensing at the human-robot interface and muscle activity monitoring to provide a more comprehensive assessment of user participation. The estimated ALP is used to dynamically adapt task execution time, enabling an adaptive ALP-driven impedance control strategy. The proposed approach was tested in a laboratory setting using a collaborative robot equipped with the sensorized interface. A comparative analysis was conducted against a conventional impedance controller, commonly used in robot-aided rehabilitation scenarios. Results: The results demonstrated that participants using the ALP-driven impedance control exhibited significantly higher positive mechanical work and greater muscle activation compared to the control group. Additionally, subjective feedback indicated increased engagement and confidence when interacting with the adaptive system. Discussion: Closing the robot's control loop by adapting to ALP effectively enhanced human-robot interaction and motivated participants to engage more actively in their therapy. These findings suggest that ALP-driven control strategies may improve user involvement in robot-assisted rehabilitation, warranting further investigation in clinically relevant settings.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencehuman-centered roboticsmedical robots and systemsmultimodal monitoringrehabilitation robotics

Identifiers

PMID40060032
PMCPMC11885312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.