ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Promoting active participation in robot-aided rehabilitation via machine learning and impedance control.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Passive Movement During Robot-Assisted and Therapist-Led Rehabilitation Exercises.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Automated planning and scheduling in robot-aided rehabilitation: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Active patient participation is crucial for effective robot-assisted rehabilitation. Quantifying the user's Active Level of Participation (ALP) during therapy and developing human-robot interaction strategies that promote engagement can improve rehabilitation outcomes. However, existing methods for estimating participation are often unimodal and do not provide continuous participation assessment. Methods: This study proposes a novel approach for estimating ALP during upper-limb robot-aided rehabilitation by leveraging machine learning within a multimodal framework. The system integrates pressure sensing at the human-robot interface and muscle activity monitoring to provide a more comprehensive assessment of user participation. The estimated ALP is used to dynamically adapt task execution time, enabling an adaptive ALP-driven impedance control strategy. The proposed approach was tested in a laboratory setting using a collaborative robot equipped with the sensorized interface. A comparative analysis was conducted against a conventional impedance controller, commonly used in robot-aided rehabilitation scenarios. Results: The results demonstrated that participants using the ALP-driven impedance control exhibited significantly higher positive mechanical work and greater muscle activation compared to the control group. Additionally, subjective feedback indicated increased engagement and confidence when interacting with the adaptive system. Discussion: Closing the robot's control loop by adapting to ALP effectively enhanced human-robot interaction and motivated participants to engage more actively in their therapy. These findings suggest that ALP-driven control strategies may improve user involvement in robot-assisted rehabilitation, warranting further investigation in clinically relevant settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.