Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060031›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Using machine learning models for cuffless blood pressure estimation with ballistocardiogram and impedance plethysmogram.

Shing-Hong Liu, Yao Sun, Bo-Yan Wu, Wenxi Chen, Xin Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shing-Hong LiuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Yao SunDivision of Information Systems, School of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of Aizu, Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan.
Bo-Yan WuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Wenxi ChenDivision of Information Systems, School of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of Aizu, Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan.
Xin ZhuDepartment of AI Technology Development, M&D Data Science Center, Institute of Integrated Research, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Blood pressure (BP) serves as a crucial parameter in the management of three prevalent chronic diseases, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and cerebrovascular diseases. However, the conventional sphygmomanometer, utilizing a cuff, is unsuitable for the approach of mobile health (mHealth). Methods: Cuffless blood pressure measurement, which eliminates the need for a cuff, is considered a promising avenue. This method is based on the relationship between pulse arrival time (PAT) parameters and BP. In this study, pulse transit time (PTT) was derived from ballistocardiograms (BCG) and impedance plethysmograms (IPG) obtained from a weight-fat scale. This study aims to address two challenges using deep learning and machine learning technologies: first, identifying BCG and IPG signals with good quality, and then extracting PTT parameters from them to estimate BP. A stacked model comprising a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) was proposed to classify the quality of BCG and IPG signals. Seven parameters, including calibration-based and calibration-free PTT parameters and heart rate (HR), were examined to estimate BP using random forest (RF) and XGBoost models. Seventeen healthy subjects participated in the study, with their BP elevated through exercise. A digital sphygmomanometer was employed to measure BP as reference values. Our methodology was validated using data collected from our custom-made device. Results: The results demonstrated a signal quality classification accuracy of 0.989. Furthermore, in the five-fold cross-validation, Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.953 ± 0.007 and 0.935 ± 0.007 were achieved for systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) estimations, respectively. The mean absolute differences (MADs) of XGBoost model were calculated as 3.54 ± 0.34 and 2.57 ± 0.17 mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively. Discussion: The proposed method significantly improved the accuracy of cuffless BP measurement, indicating its potential integration into weight-fat scales as an unconstrained device for effective utilization in mHealth applications.

Indexed as

ballistocardiogramblood pressure estimationcuffless blood pressure measurementimpedance plethysmogramsignal quality classification

Identifiers

PMID40060031
PMCPMC11885288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.