Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060006›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2025

Ionic liquids as stabilisers of therapeutic protein formulations: a review of insulin and monoclonal antibodies.

Samuel Tien, Veysel Kayser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Biophysical reviews · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samuel TienSydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia.
Veysel KayserSydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic proteins such as insulin and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become an essential part of the modern healthcare system and play a crucial role in the treatment of various diseases including cancer and autoimmune disorders. However, their long-term stability is a significant concern, affecting efficacy, shelf-life, and safety. Ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as promising additives to enhance protein stability and address the aforementioned issues. Indeed, recent studies indicate that biocompatible ILs, particularly choline-based ILs, have significant potential to improve stability while preserving proteins' functionality. For instance, choline valinate has been shown to increase the melting temperature of insulin by almost 13 °C (Judy and Kishore Biochimie 207:20-32, 2023), while choline dihydrogen phosphate has increased the melting temperature of trastuzumab by over 21 °C (Reslan et al. Chem Commun 54:10622-10625, 2018). However, it is worth noting that the use of some ILs introduces a complex trade-off: while they can increase thermal stability, they may also promote protein unfolding, thereby reducing conformational stability. Moreover, selecting the most suitable IL and its optimal concentration is challenging, as different protein formulations may exhibit varying effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the existing literature on ILs as stabilisers for insulin and mAbs, documenting specific IL-protein combinations and conditions to identify potential future stabilising agents for biologics in general.

Indexed as

Conformational stabilityFormulation of biologicsInsulinIonic liquidMonoclonal antibodyThermal stability

Identifiers

PMID40060006
PMCPMC11885717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.