ArticleSSM - population health2025
An overview of modern machine learning methods for effect measure modification analyses in high-dimensional settings.
Article in SSM - population health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consistent analgesic effect of intravenous dexamethasone on rebound pain after brachial plexus block: a causal machine learning approach.The Korean journal of pain · 2026Article
- Integrating education-based interventions and machine learning for stunting prevention: A case study in East Lombok, Indonesia.Dialogues in health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A primary concern of public health researchers involves identifying and quantifying heterogeneous exposure effects across population subgroups. Understanding the magnitude and direction of these effects on a given scale provides researchers the ability to recommend policy prescriptions and assess the external validity of findings. Traditional methods for effect measure modification analyses require manual model specification that is often impractical or not feasible to conduct in high-dimensional settings. Recent developments in machine learning aim to solve this issue by utilizing data-driven approaches to estimate heterogeneous exposure effects. However, these methods do not directly identify effect modifiers and estimate corresponding subgroup effects. Consequently, additional analysis techniques are required to use these methods in the context of effect measure modification analyses. While no data-driven method or technique can identify effect modifiers and domain expertise is still required, they may serve an important role in the discovery of vulnerable subgroups when prior knowledge is not available. We summarize and provide the intuition behind these machine learning methods and discuss how they may be employed for effect measure modification analyses to serve as a reference for public health researchers. We discuss their implementation in R with annotated syntax and demonstrate their application by assessing the heterogeneous effects of drought on stunting among children in the Demographic and Health survey data set as a case study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.