ArticleMaterials and structures2025
Electro-mechanical behaviour of mortars reinforced with alternative electrically conductive inclusions.
Article in Materials and structures, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incorporation of electrically conductive inclusions in structural materials can impart self-sensing functionalities, making them ideal for structural health monitoring applications. However, the use of more sustainable alternatives and their effect on key engineering properties remain largely unexplored, while the adoption of different testing protocols for the characterisation of electrical/self-sensing properties can lead to different results, thus questioning their reliability, even for existing smart composites. This paper investigates systematically the effect of recycled carbon fibres and graphite powder on the mechanical, electrical, transport properties and piezoresistive performance of cementitious mortars. Virgin carbon fibres, at dosages equivalent to those of recycled fibres, were also examined to establish a performance benchmark. Fibre content ranged from 0.05% to 1% vol., while graphite powder was added as sand replacement at contents varying from 0.3% to 3% vol. The effect of existing testing protocols and electrode layout on the piezoresistive performance was also examined, and the associated limitations and challenges are discussed in detail. The results demonstrate the potential of recycled carbon fibres as a cost-effective alternative in smart applications, without compromising electrical and piezoresistive performance. The use of 0.25%vol. of recycled or virgin carbon fibres was found to provide the desirable synergy between structural performance, cost and self-sensing properties, yielding a 50-60% increase in flexural strength, and good piezoresistivity with a gauge factor of 90-110. In contrast, the use of graphite powder resulted in composites with poor self-sensing ability even at the highest content examined (3%vol.), also accompanied by a reduction in compressive strength up to 33%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.