ArticleToxicology research2025
Do the azo food colorings carmoisine and ponceau 4R have a genotoxic potential?
Article in Toxicology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Today, ready-to-eat foods to which various additives are frequently added are widely consumed. Food colorings constitute an essential part of these additives. Carmoisine (E-122) and Ponceau 4R (E-124) are the most commonly used azo food colorings. This study aimed to investigate the in vitro genotoxic effects of these two food dyes in human peripheral lymphocytes using four different and complementary genotoxicity tests (chromosome aberrations (CAs), sister chromatid exchange (SCEs), cytokinesis block micronucleus cytome (CBMN-Cyt) and comet). When four different concentrations (37.5, 75, 150, and 300 μg/mL) of both food dyes were applied to lymphocytes for 24 and 48 h, it was observed that only the highest concentration significantly increased the frequencies of CA and SCE. The mitotic index (MI) decreased compared to the control at all concentrations except the lowest one in the 24-h treatment of Carmoisine and the two highest concentrations (150, 300 μg/mL) in the 48-h treatment. In the 24-h Ponceau 4R treatment, MI decreased compared to the control at all concentrations except the lowest and all concentrations in the 48-h treatment. In contrast, Carmoisine and Ponceau 4R did not affect MN frequency. In the comet test, Carmoisine increased tail length only at the highest concentration, and Ponceau 4R increased tail length at the two highest concentrations. Ponceau 4R also increased tail moment only at the highest concentration. When the results of these four in vitro genotoxicity tests were evaluated together, it was concluded that both food colors were genotoxic, especially at high concentrations, but not at low concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.