ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
Evaluation of prognostic scores in patients with HCC undergoing first-line immunotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of treatment response and survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma receiving sorafenib: pretreatment prognostic scores.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Interactive Roles of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease and Nutritional Status in the Prognosis of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgical Resection.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Peripheral blood biomarkers for predicting response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Early C-reactive protein kinetics predict outcomes in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multicenter, observational study comparing different C-reactive protein kinetic definitions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy Combined with PD-1 Inhibitors and Targeted Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Real-World Multicenter Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Validation of the Up7-ALBI Score for Prognostication in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Prognostic factors in first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment of intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.PloS one · 2026Article
- A structured, indicator-driven quality improvement cycle is associated with improved adherence and outcomes after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Development of a novel prognostic score for 1-year survival in immunotherapy-treated patients with unresectable HCC: the ALIVE-IO score.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the FAAP model for prognostic stratification in HCC patients treated with TACE, sintilimab plus bevacizumab: a multicenter study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
59 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background & Aims: Immunotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (a + b) has improved the prognosis of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the outcome for individual patients is highly variable. This study aimed to (i) develop and validate a prognostic prediction model to estimate individual prognosis and (ii) compare it with established models. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, patients with HCC undergoing first-line immunotherapy with a + b from 24 centers (Europe, USA) were included. Statistical analysis and reporting followed the TRIPOD guidelines. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). A Cox model was developed and externally validated. Results: In total, 683 patients were included (training: 526, validation: 157). The C-reactive protein, albumin, bilirubin, lymphocytes, ECOG performance status, and extrahepatic spread (CABLE score) remained significantly associated with OS in Cox regression analysis. In the training set, the CABLE score had a higher discriminatory accuracy relative to ALBI, EZ-ALBI, mALBI, CRAFITY, PNI, NLR, PLR, and GPS (time-dependent AUC 0.79 and C-index 0.75 (95% CI 0.71-0.78) at 12 months). In the external validation set, the discriminatory performance of the CABLE score was comparable to ALBI, EZ-ALBI, and mALBI, but on average higher than PNI, CRAFITY, NLR, PLR, and GPS. In patients with Child-Pugh A, the CABLE score outperformed ALBI, EZ-ALBI, and mALBI in the first 9 months. We provide a web-based calculator for the CABLE score to allow estimation of individual prognosis for these patients (http://shiny.imbei.uni-mainz.de:3838/CABLE_Score/). Conclusions: The CABLE score shows good discriminatory performance in assessing the individual prognosis of patients undergoing first-line immunotherapy with a + b. Further validation studies are needed to investigate its performance compared with the ALBI score, in particular in subgroup analysis. Impact and implications: The CABLE score allows estimation of the prognosis of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing first-line immunotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab at an individual level using our web-based calculator. This feature, as well as the evaluation of the score's added benefit through an extensive comparison with other established scores, can inform clinicians on their significance and may guide clinical decision-making in the context of a malignant disease where the prognosis has become highly variable. Further large validation studies are needed to investigate the incremental value of the CABLE score compared with the ALBI score, in particular in subgroups such as patients designated as Child-Pugh A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.