Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40059875›Full record

ArticleOpen life sciences2025

Optimization and comparative study of

Ogechukwu Bose Chukwuma, Mohd Rafatullah, Riti Thapar Kapoor, Husnul Azan Tajarudin, Norli Ismail, Mahboob Alam, Masoom Raza Siddiqui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Synergistic probiotic consortium ofVeterinary world · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ogechukwu Bose ChukwumaEnvironmental Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 11800, Malaysia.
Mohd RafatullahEnvironmental Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 11800, Malaysia.
Riti Thapar KapoorCentre for Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, 201 313, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Husnul Azan TajarudinBioprocess Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 11800, Malaysia.
Norli IsmailEnvironmental Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 11800, Malaysia.
Mahboob AlamDivision of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Dongguk University, 123, Dongdaero, Gyeongju-si, 780714, Republic of Korea.
Masoom Raza SiddiquiChemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass, owing to its recalcitrant nature, requires a consortium of enzymes for its breakdown. The present study deals with the isolation of cellulolytic bacterial strains from landfill leachate collected from the Pulau Burung landfill site of Penang, Malaysia, and consortia were constructed to test their cellulolytic efficiency. The dinitro salicylate method was used for the estimation of enzyme activity, and consortia were compared with promising bacterial strains. The combined potential of promising bacterial strains was optimized at varying experimental conditions to detect their maximum cellulolytic activity. The results showed that eight bacterial strains reflected hydrolytic activities, and these were identified by 16S rDNA sequence as

Indexed as

Bacillus speciescellulolytic abilityconsortialandfill leachatelignocellulose biomass

Identifiers

PMID40059875
PMCPMC11889503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.