Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40059728›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2025

Prognostic Value of Trop-2 Expression in Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Correlation With Emerging Biomarkers.

William Jacot, Marie-Christine Chateau, Simon Thezenas, Séverine Guiu, Nelly Firmin, Virginie Lafont, Gwendal Lazennec, Charles Theillet, Florence Boissière-Michot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

William JacotDepartment of Medical Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7834-061X
Marie-Christine ChateauTranslational Research Unit, Montpellier Cancer Institute Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.
Simon ThezenasBiometrics Unit, Institut du Cancer Montpellier (ICM), Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Séverine GuiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.
Nelly FirminInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France.
Virginie LafontMontpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Gwendal LazennecCNRS UMR9005, Sys2Diag, Alcen, Montpellier, France.
Charles TheilletInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5555-2759
Florence Boissière-MichotTranslational Research Unit, Montpellier Cancer Institute Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.

Funding

Daiichi Sankyo, inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTriple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype, in which targeting the Trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2), using antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), results in significant clinical improvement. However, clinicopathological correlations with Trop-2 protein expression levels remain limited in TNBC patients.

methodsHere we assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the mouse monoclonal anti-Trop-2 antibody (Enzo, Cat. ENZ-ABS380) cell membrane Trop-2 expression levels and classified them in 3 H-Score classes, low (< 100), moderate (100-200), and strong (> 200). We also evaluated potential associations with clinicopathological variables including basal-like and molecular apocrine phenotypes, immune infiltrate characteristics, PTEN and PIK3CA alterations in a large retrospective series of 228 nonmetastatic TNBC patients.

resultsTrop-2 expression was evaluated as low, moderate and strong in 12.3%, 28.9%, and 58.8% of the cases respectively. Only 3 tumors showed no Trop-2 expression. Interestingly, Trop-2 expression was not associated with classical breast cancer clinicopathological variables, HER2 levels or molecular subtype, neither did we observe an association with relapse-free survival. Only a marginal association with pT1 tumors was observed, which tended to express increased levels of Trop-2 protein. In order to determine possible fluctuations of Trop-2 protein expression levels during the course of the disease, we studied a second independent cohort of 18 TNBC comprised of serial tissue samples (diagnostic biopsies, surgical resection specimens and corresponding patients-derived xenografts (PDX)). Trop-2 levels remained globally stable between cognate tumor samples with only one exception corresponding to a Trop-2-negative tumor giving rise to a Trop-2-positive PDX.

conclusionsAs Trop-2 expression appears nearly constant and independent of classical TNBC variables and outcome, association of anti-Trop-2 therapies with other targeted therapies can be evaluated without reducing the population in specific TNBC subgroups.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesTACSTD2 protein, humanbasal‐likeexpressionmolecular apocrineprognosistriple‐negative breast cancerTrop‐2

Identifiers

PMID40059728
PMCPMC11891490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.