ArticleJournal of clinical periodontology2025
Multi-Centre External Validation of a Nomogram for 10-Year Periodontal Tooth Loss Prediction.
Article in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Panoramic Radiography for Assessing Maxillary Posterior Root Protrusion into the Maxillary Sinus: A Cluster-Adjusted Prediction Model Using CBCT as Reference.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Residual Pockets as an Endpoint on Periodontal Disease Progression in Supportive Periodontal Care.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026Article
- Clinical and biomechanical determinants of immediate, early, progressive, and delayed implant loading: A comprehensive narrative review.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Review
- Developing Predictive Models for Periodontitis Progression Using Artificial Intelligence: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo externally validate the potential applicability of the 2018 classification of periodontal diseases as a risk assessment tool, through the use of a nomogram built on a multivariate predictor model. MATERIALS AND
methodsData from 459 patients with periodontitis, across four cohorts (three in the United States, and one in the United Kingdom), were retrospectively analysed. After staging and grading periodontitis before active periodontal therapy (APT), patients were categorised by the model as having 'low tooth loss' (≤ 1 teeth lost due periodontal reasons [TLP]) or 'high tooth loss' (≥ 2 TLP) at a 10-year follow-up. Model discrimination was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve. Calibration was assessed through calibration plots, calibration-in-the-large (CITL), calibration slope and the expected:observed (E:O) ratio. Recalibration methods, including Temperature Scaling, Isotonic Regression and Beta Calibration, were also tested.
resultsThe original nomogram yielded an aggregate AUC-ROC 0.72 but showed poor calibration. Isotonic recalibration improved the AUC-ROC to 0.77 and enhanced calibration metrics, achieving an E-statistic of 1.00, CITL of 0.00 and a calibration slope of 1.00.
conclusionA nomogram based on the components of the 2018 periodontal disease classification can serve as a prognostic tool with cross-site applicability across clinical settings in industrialised countries, accurately predicting the 10-year risk of tooth loss due to periodontitis from the initial assessment conducted before the start of APT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.