ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
"I Became the Messenger Between the Hospitals": A Study on the Journeys of People With Cancer Using the Critical Incident Technique.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPatients with serious conditions face complex, long-lasting patient journeys involving multiple healthcare providers. Research shows that these journeys are frequently perceived as fragmented, with significant challenges in communication and information flow. However, there is limited knowledge about the organisational and informational aspects linked to good and poor experiences. This study investigated critical factors in cancer journeys, focusing on communication and the informational and organisational elements shaping patient experiences.
methodsThe critical incident technique was used to identify positive and negative factors in cancer patient journeys. People with cancer and their next-of-kin were recruited through Norway's national cancer organisation. Patient episodes were collected from 41 participants via digital workshops combined with questionnaires and supplemented by in-depth interviews. Critical incidents were extracted using specific analytical criteria.
resultsA total of 187 critical incidents were identified, including 81 positive and 106 negative. Content analysis revealed 12 categories of incidents. Positive incidents were linked to effective communication, timely information, and well-coordinated care, particularly through cancer pathways. Negative incidents often involved communication delays, insensitive information delivery, and poor coordination among healthcare providers. Notably, around 40% of the negative incidents stemmed from fragmented health services or a lack of progress, often forcing patients to act as messengers.
conclusionBy examining critical experiences, this study highlights key areas for improving cancer care. Timely information and clinical empathy when delivering sensitive diagnoses are essential. Healthcare providers must coordinate services more effectively to prevent patients from intervening to ensure care progress. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients' stories formed the core data. The public contributed to recruitment, while patient feedback informed the workshop design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.