Trial reportCurrent medical imaging2025
Integration of Three-dimensional Visualization Reconstruction Technology with Problem-Based Learning in the Clinical Training of Resident Physicians Specialized in Pheochromocytoma.
Trial report in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of PBL combined with mini-CEX evaluation model in the clinical teaching of urological clinic teaching.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe examined the effectiveness of integrating three-dimensional (3D) visualization reconstruction technology with Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in the clinical teaching of resident physicians focusing on pheochromocytoma.
methodsFifty resident physicians specializing in urology at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were randomly divided into two groups over the period spanning January 2022 to January 2024: an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group underwent instruction utilizing a pedagogical approach that integrated 3D visualization reconstruction technology with PBL, while the control group used a traditional teaching model. A comparative analysis of examination performance and teaching satisfaction between both groups of resident physicians was conducted to assess the efficacy of the integrated 3D visualization and PBL teaching methods in clinical instruction.
resultsThe experimental group demonstrated superior performance in both theoretical assessment and clinical skills evaluation, along with heightened levels of teaching satisfaction compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Additionally, the experimental group exhibited markedly higher scores in both theoretical examinations and practical assessments compared to their counterparts in the control group (p < 0.05). The results of theoretical examinations for the experimental group and the control group were 92.15±3.22 and 81.09±4.46, respectively (< 0.0001). The results of practical examinations for the experimental group and the control group were 90.17±3.48 and 70.75±5.11, respectively (< 0.0001).
conclusionIn the clinical teaching of training resident physicians specializing in urology for the management of pheochromocytoma, the integration of 3D visualization reconstruction technology with the PBL method significantly enhanced the teaching efficacy, improving both the quality of instruction and the level of satisfaction among participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.