ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Imaging and Diagnostic Challenges in an 11-Year-Old Girl with Vaginal Agenesis: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of female genital tract anomalies is around 4-6.9%. Vaginal agenesis is a form of Müllerian agenesis and defined as the congenital absence of the vagina. It affects 1 in 5000 women. During normal fetal development, the Müllerian ducts combine to form the uterus, fallopian tubes, and most of the vagina. However, in cases of vaginal agenesis, the Müllerian ducts fail to fuse to form the upper part of the vagina. This report presents the case of an 11-year-old girl with vaginal agenesis evaluated using ultrasound. CASE REPORT An 11-year-old girl, Tanner stage II, presented with cyclic abdominal pain for 3 months and no menarche. After a hymenectomy for imperforate hymen in January 2023 failed to relieve symptoms, she was referred to our hospital. Physical examination showed a tender lower abdomen with no genital abnormalities. Transabdominal ultrasound was inconclusive for differentiating between a transverse vaginal septum and cervical agenesis with hematometra, and magnetic resonance imaging suggested hematometrocolpos due to a transverse vaginal septum. Intraoperatively, distal vaginal agenesis was identified, and vaginoplasty was performed, evacuating 200 mL of thick blood. The cervix and uterus were normal, and postoperative management included gradual vaginal dilation with a soft mold. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of distal vaginal agenesis, particularly in patients with a history of imperforate hymen. CONCLUSIONS This report emphasizes the importance of accurate imaging and clinical evaluation in diagnosing reproductive anomalies such as distal vaginal agenesis. Developing techniques to enhance the specificity of imaging modalities is crucial for distinguishing vaginal agenesis from a transverse vaginal septum, ensuring appropriate surgical management and better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.