ReviewRadiation research2025
Radiation-induced Brain Injury and the Radiation Late Effects Cohort (RLEC) of Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).
Review in Radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal α/β Ratio for Biologically Effective Dose-Based Prediction of Radiation-Induced Peritumoral Brain Edema in Meningioma.Cancers · 2026Article
- γ-Radiation Induces Long-Term Dose-Related Proteomic and Phosphorylated-Tau Species Changes in Non-Human Primate Hippocampus.Research square · 2026Article
- Widespread Multimorbidity in a Cohort of Aging, Radiation-exposed Rhesus Macaques.Radiation research · 2025Article
- Muse cell transplantation attenuates neuroinflammation and preserves endothelial reparative responses after radiation-induced brain injury.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the event of a nuclear accident or attack, thousands of people could receive high doses of total-body irradiation (TBI). Although retrospective analyses of atomic bomb and nuclear disaster survivors have been conducted, the long-term outcomes on the brain and cognitive function are conflicting. Radiation-induced brain injury (RIBI) is characterized by inflammation, vascular injury, deficits in neuronal function, and white matter (WM) injury, but the molecular mechanisms by which this occurs remain unknown. Animal models are crucial for evaluating radiation effects on the brain and have provided significant insight into the pathogenesis of RIBI. Rodents are the most commonly utilized animal models in radiation research, and much has been gleaned from these animals. Non-human primates (NHPs) are the closest genetically, anatomically, and physiologically to humans and therefore represent a valuable resource in translational neuroscience. NHPs have been utilized in radiation studies for several decades and continue to be important models of RIBI, yet few studies have evaluated the long-term impact of radiation on neurocognitive function. The Radiation Late Effects Cohort (RLEC) is a group of rhesus macaques dedicated to evaluating the long-term effects of TBI on multiple systems, including the nervous system. Studies have demonstrated that animals within the RLEC manifest shared patterns of injury between macaques and humans after fractionated whole-brain irradiation (WBI), including vascular injury, neuroinflammation, and WM injury. While pathological outcomes in late-delayed RIBI have been well characterized, studies evaluating the functional outcomes in NHPs are scarce, highlighting the need for future studies. Correlating relevant structural and functional outcomes are critical for identifying targets involved in the pathogenesis of injury. Much information has been gleaned from animal studies of RIBI, and NHPs, particularly those in the RLEC will continue to be valuable models in translational neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.