ArticleProgress in orthodontics2025
Biomechanical analysis of clear aligners for mandibular anterior teeth intrusion and its clinical application in the design of new aligner attachment.
Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of an indirect anchorage reinforcement device on maxillary anterior intrusion with clear aligners: a three-dimensional finite element analysis and exploratory clinical validation.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional study of mandibular anterior intrusion with clear aligners for adult deep-bite correction.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of attachment wear on maxillary canine rotation in clear aligner therapy: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Biomechanical analysis of maxillary incisor intrusion with clear aligners under different periodontal conditions: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Correction of the curve of spee using clear aligner therapy: A finite element analysis of three lower anterior intrusion protocols.PloS one · 2026Article
- Biomechanical effects of aligner trimline design and intrusion protocol on mandibular anterior teeth: a finite element study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Factors influencing fenestration and dehiscence in the anterior teeth after clear aligner treatment: a multicenter retrospective study.Progress in orthodontics · 2025Article
- Predictability of Lower Incisor Intrusion with Clear Aligners: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Influencing Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuring the process of intruding the mandibular anterior teeth (MAT) with clear aligners (CA), the teeth are susceptible to undesigned buccal and lingual inclinations, leading to complications such as excessive alveolar bone resorption and root exposure that significantly compromise the treatment outcome. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate the underlying causes and develop effective coping strategies.
methodsWe first statistically analyzed the clinical issues, then used FEA to explore their underlying mechanisms to guide the design of attachments in clinical practice. Specifically, CBCT data before and after the intrusion treatment of MAT were collected to analyze the labial-lingual inclination of the MAT and the distance between the root apex and alveolar bone wall. Finite element analysis (FEA) models of MAT undergoing vertical intrusion with standard CA were created with eight incisor mandibular plane angles (IMPA) to assess displacement trends, labial and lingual moments, and crown contact forces. Additionally, six aligner attachments were designed to simulate and analyze their biomechanical mechanisms.
resultsSignificant differences were observed in changes before and after treatment. When the IMPA was 90°, the crown experienced a labial moment. The labial root control ridge (RCR) increased the labial moment of the crown, while the lingual RCR and labial attachment (LA) increased the lingual moment. The lingual fossa excavating holes (LFEH) group also increased the labial moment. The lingual RCR enhanced the lingual movement of the crown, whereas the LFEH promoted labial movement. During the intrusion of MAT, a comprehensive design incorporating labial intrusive attachments, labial RCR, lingual RCR, and LFEH can be employed to ensure true vertical intrusion of the lower anterior teeth.
conclusionThis study revealed the biomechanical changes during intrusion, and innovatively designed the LFEH, thereby promoting the development of novel orthodontic techniques and improving clinical treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.