Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40059244›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Comparative analysis of Feedlot and Free-range cattle management on Botswana beef quality: a study of sustainability, post-mortem examination, and SWOT analysis.

Brianna E Parsons, Joshuah Makore, Boisy Motube, Gregory Thato Rakobe, Solomon Stephen Ramabu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Interconnection between pastures, grazing ecosystem, animal welfare, meat quality, and human health.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brianna E ParsonsSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Center for Stewardship Agriculture and Food Security, New Bolton Center, Kennett Square, PA, USA. bpars@vet.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-1975
Joshuah MakoreDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Content Farm, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gaborone, Botswana.
Boisy MotubeMultispecies Abattoir Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Gregory Thato RakobeDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Content Farm, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gaborone, Botswana.
Solomon Stephen RamabuDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Content Farm, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gaborone, Botswana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African agriculture faces triple threats of climate change, population growth and inequality, necessitating sustainability research in agriculture that comprehensively examines social, economic, environmental, and socio-political trade-offs. To examine sustainable beef production in Botswana, this study used a mixed-method approach to explore Feedlot and Free-range cattle management systems. First, competing but overlapping factors of environmental, economic, and social sustainability in beef production were identified from literature review, and a conceptual framework for sustainability was used to assess the trade-offs inherent in both management systems. Second, abattoir post-mortem examinations were used to compare 25 feedlot cattle and 22 free-range cattle across standard factors including: carcass dress mass (CDM), carcass grade, fat colour, conformation, dentition, carcass and offal postmortem decisions, and reasons for the decisions. Lastly, sustainability trade-offs for feedlot and free-range cattle management were compared through a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunity, and Threats (SWOT) analysis. Sustainability assessment showed that feedlots rely on imported grains like corn and soybean, increasing producers' uncertainty as an increasingly turbulent world affects grains availability and pricing. Free-range pasture systems, on the other hand, rely on rainfed agriculture (and often communal lands), which are increasingly challenged by the intersections of climate change, overgrazing and issues of land access. Feedlot animals had a significantly higher CDM (p = 0.0001) at 237.56 kg ± 6.98 (Mean ± SEM) compared to 184.50 kg ± 7.44 for Free-range cattle and higher incidences of red offal condemnation rates (lung, liver, and spleen) (p < 0.05) compared to free-range cattle. Free-range cattle had higher green offal condemnation rates specifically large tripe (p = 0.026) compared to feedlot cattle. SWOT analysis confirmed the trade-offs in several factors including carcass weight, feed costs, and climate change impacts. The conceptual framework for sustainability, postmortem findings and SWOT analysis reveal cattle farming challenges and trade-offs that must be made to address disease burdens, animal nutrition, and productivity in Botswana.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryRed MeatAbattoirsAnimalsAutopsyBotswanaCattleClimate ChangeAfrican animal agricultureClimate changeMixed-method approachOne HealthSustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID40059244
PMCPMC11891096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.