Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40059231›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025

S2AI vs. iliac screws in spinopelvic fixation for adult spinal deformity: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Alejandro Gómez-Rice, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Sleiman Haddad, Riccardo Raganato, Yann Philippe Charles, Franciso Pérez-Grueso, Frank Kleinstück, Ibrahim Obeid, Ahmet Alanay, Ferran Pellise and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alejandro Gómez-RiceHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Carretera de Colmenar Viejo Km 9.100., 28034, Madrid, Spain. alexgomezrice@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1040-7368
Susana Núñez-PereiraHospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Sleiman HaddadHospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Riccardo RaganatoHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Yann Philippe CharlesStrasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Franciso Pérez-GruesoHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Frank KleinstückSchulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ibrahim ObeidCHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Ahmet AlanayAcibadem Hospital, Istambul, Turkey.
Ferran PelliseHospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier PizonesHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
ESSG European Spine Study Group ESSG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) technique with the iliac screw (IS) technique in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients in terms of clinical and radiographical outcomes, focusing on reoperations, complications, and change in radiographic parameters.

methodsThis is a retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter database. ASD patients who underwent long fusion to the pelvis with 2-year postoperative follow-up were included. To compare outcomes (radiographic, clinical, and complications), matching was performed based on the type of pelvic fixation (IS vs. S2AI) using propensity score matching (PSM), 1:1 ratio, caliper 0.1, tolerance ≤ 0.001, with a 95% confidence interval. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for each group and compared between the two groups by the log-rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model.

resultsOut of 1442 patients undergoing intervention with a 2-year follow-up, 555 were identified as having pelvic instrumentation. Among them, 52 patients fixed with S2AI screws were matched with 52 patients fixed with IS using PSM for age, body mass index (BMI), number of fused levels, and global tilt. No significant differences were found in radiographic correction, reoperation rates, or infection rates. The percentage of mechanical complications (MC) was higher in the IS screw group, with a statistically significant increase in MC-free survival in the S2AI screw group (80.6 vs. 61.2 months; p = 0.022), with a HR of 0.43 (p = 0.027). Patients with S2AI screws reported higher immediate postoperative pain at 6 weeks, with this difference leveling off in subsequent assessments. At 2 years, a higher percentage of radiolucent halos were observed in the S2AI screw group (59.6% vs. 34%; p = 0.017), but there were no differences in pain assessments in the quality-of-life tests.

conclusionAfter a thorough comparison, both pelvic fixation methods showed similar deformity correction and reintervention rates. However, iliac screws had more mechanical complications, while S2AI screws, crossing the sacroiliac joint, led to higher short-term postoperative pain and increased radiological loosening at 2 years.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsIliumSpinal CurvaturesSpinal FusionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRadiographyReoperationRetrospective StudiesSacrumAdult spinal deformity (ASD)Iliac screws (IS)Mechanical complications; Radiographic outcomesPelvic fixationS2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.