ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid approach for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life prediction using signal decomposition and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A passive islanding detection method using deep neural bidirectional LSTM-CNN.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative study of granular computing and RKCCA-based feature fusion for early lithium-ion battery RUL estimation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid CNN-DNN model for battery remaining useful life RUL prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Lithium-ion battery RUL prediction based on optimized VMD-SSA-PatchTST algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries are widely used in many fields, and accurate prediction of their remaining useful life (RUL) was crucial for effective battery management and safety assurance. In order to solve the problem of reduced RUL prediction accuracy caused by the local capacity regeneration phenomenon during battery capacity degradation, this paper proposed a novel RUL prediction method, which combined complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) technique with an innovative hybrid prediction strategy that integrated the support vector regression (SVR) and the long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. First, CEEMDAN was used to decompose the battery capacity data into high-frequency and low-frequency components, thereby reducing the impact of capacity regeneration. Subsequently, the SVR model predicted the low-frequency component that characterized the main degradation trend, and the high-frequency component that contained capacity regeneration features was predicted using an LSTM network optimized by the sparrow search algorithm (SSA). Finally, the final RUL prediction was obtained by combining the predictions of the two models. Experimental results on NASA public datasets showed that the proposed hybrid method significantly outperformed existing methods: the RMSE of the methods proposed in this paper were all less than 0.0086 Ah, the MAE were all less than 0.0060 Ah, the R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.