Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40059209›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2025

Barriers and facilitators to contraception provision among rural healthcare providers.

Alexandra Buscaglia, Annie Glover, Nicole Smith, Al Garnsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra BuscagliaRural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Annie GloverRural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA. gloveral@uab.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6073-5760
Nicole SmithMontanans for Choice, Helena, MT, USA.
Al GarnseyRural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5580-6333

Funding

HRSA HHS U7AMC33718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to a full range of contraceptive options ensures that individuals can make autonomous decisions about their health and wellbeing. Contraceptive continuity requires that individuals have access in their local communities to a variety of methods, which may change throughout their reproductive lives. Individuals living in rural areas face healthcare access barriers which require special considerations to ensure continuous and effective utilization of contraception to support family planning decision-making. One particular type of family planning service-contraception provided to the postpartum individual-presents challenges related to reimbursement, provider training, and timing of placement, which can be complicated further for individuals who must travel for care.

objectiveThis study sought to assess family planning provider perspectives in rural communities, including their knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to general contraception provision, provision of contraception in the specialized circumstance of the postpartum period, and provider assessment of barriers to care to identify strategies to improve access to contraception across the reproductive life cycle.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods study with an electronic survey of 90 reproductive healthcare providers, and semi-structured follow-up interviews of 9 providers. All providers are currently licensed and provide patient care in Montana. The survey instrument was designed with feedback from physicians and nurses and included questions on contraceptive practices, knowledge, and barriers to providing contraceptive care. Quantitative survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and bivariate tests of significance. Qualitative interviews were coded using a combined inductive and deductive approach.

resultsMontana providers consistently reported cost and insurance-related procedural barriers. Additional important themes emerged from qualitative interviews regarding barriers to contraceptive access, including experiences with provider-, institutional-, and practice-level barriers, and provider philosophy and approach to contraceptive care.

conclusionsThis study identifies knowledge gaps, institutional and procedural barriers and facilitators, and provider approaches to contraceptive care in Montana. Findings suggest that the need to increase provider awareness of Montana Medicaid coverage of immediate postpartum contraception. Results should inform future interventions to increase access to hospital-based contraceptive care.

Indexed as

Access to careContraceptive care trainingFamily planningLARCMaternal healthRural health disparities

Identifiers

PMID40059209
PMCPMC11892257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.