Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40059148›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Gender disparities in end-of-life care: A scoping review of patient, caregiver and care provider perspectives in low-and middle-income countries.

Divya Narayanan, Akshaya Sudha Chandrasekaran, Elstin Anbu Raj S, Navya Vyas

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Divya NarayananDepartment of Global Public Health Policy and Governance, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576 104, Karnataka, India.
Akshaya Sudha ChandrasekaranDepartment of Global Public Health Policy and Governance, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576 104, Karnataka, India.
Elstin Anbu Raj SCenter for Evidence-Informed Decision Making, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576 104, Karnataka, India.
Navya VyasDepartment of Global Public Health Policy and Governance, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576 104, Karnataka, India. navya.vyas@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe term "end-of-life" care refers to the physical, social, spiritual, and emotional assistance provided to people near the end of their lives. Throughout history, gender has profoundly impacted many of the decisions people make. Studies have shown an increased demand for palliative care worldwide, which varies significantly among low-and middle-income countries. Achieving universal health coverage requires everyone to have access to health care where and when they need it, irrespective of gender. This scoping review aims to map the evidence available on the gender disparities in end-of-life care in low-and middle-income countries, considering the perspectives of patients, caregivers, and care providers. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive search was done for the review in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. The World Health Organization's definition of gender was the inclusion standard. Studies conducted in low-and middle-income countries were included. Only articles published between 2005 and 2024 were retained. Articles on sexual minorities were excluded.

resultsEight articles were selected for the review and the descriptive analysis was done, followed by a thematic analysis to synthesize the available data into themes. The themes identified based on the patient's perspectives were end-of-life preferences, challenges, and perceptions towards caregiving. Care provider perspectives included attitude toward euthanasia and perception towards care provision, while caregiver perspectives involved perceptions of caregiving and challenges. Gender disparities were evident across all perspectives, with women being disproportionately affected.

conclusionThe review identified significant gender disparities in different aspects of end-of-life care. Women often experience a greater caregiving burden and higher risks of emotional, physical, and sexual violence, while men encounter societal stigma in caregiving roles. Addressing these disparities is required to ensure equitable and inclusive EOL care. Further research should be done in this direction to identify the influence of gender on end-of-life care and how it interacts with other factors like culture, religion, socio-economic status, and education to inform policies that promote gender-sensitive end-of-life care.

Indexed as

CaregiversHealthcare DisparitiesHealth PersonnelPatientsTerminal CareDeveloping CountriesHumansSex FactorsEnd-of-life careGender disparitiesLow-and middle-income countriesPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID40059148
PMCPMC11892201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.