Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40059136›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2025

Metabolic engineering for sustainable xylitol production from diverse carbon sources in Pichia pastoris.

Xiaocong Lu, Mingxin Chang, Xiangyu Li, Wenbing Cao, Zhoukang Zhuang, Qian Wu, Tao Yu, Aiqun Yu, Hongting Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaocong Lu *State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300457, China.
Mingxin Chang *State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300457, China.
Xiangyu Li *State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300457, China.
Wenbing CaoCenter for Synthetic Biochemistry, Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institutes for Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Zhoukang ZhuangCenter for Synthetic Biochemistry, Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institutes for Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Qian WuCenter for Synthetic Biochemistry, Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institutes for Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Tao YuCenter for Synthetic Biochemistry, Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institutes for Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China. tao.yu@siat.ac.cn.
Aiqun YuState Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300457, China. yuaiqun@tust.edu.cn.
Hongting TangSchool of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, China. tanght23@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2021YFA0911000National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071416Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Tianjin Municipality 22JCYBJC00170Shenzhen Key Laboratory for the Intelligent Microbial Manufacturing of Medicines ZDSYS20210623091810032Special Project for Research and Development in Key areas of Guangdong Province 2022B1111080005Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDB0480000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xylitol, known for its health benefits, is a valuable compound in the food and pharmaceutical industries. However, conventional chemical production methods are often unsustainable for large-scale applications, prompting the need for alternative approaches. This study demonstrates a significant enhancement in xylitol production using microbial cell factories, optimized through metabolic engineering. Two synthetic pathways were combined, and the introduction of a novel NADPH-dependent xylitol dehydrogenase further boosted xylitol yields, achieving 0.14 g xylitol/g glucose-a record-high yield for microbial systems. Additionally, the use of sustainable feedstocks, such as glycerol and methanol, led to the production of 7000 mg/L xylitol with a yield of 0.35 g xylitol/g glycerol, and 250 mg/L xylitol from methanol. These results underscore the potential for eco-friendly, cost-effective xylitol production, providing a robust foundation for future industrial-scale biotechnological applications.

Indexed as

CarbonMetabolic EngineeringSaccharomycetalesXylitolD-Xylulose ReductaseFermentationGlucoseGlycerolMethanolCarbonD-Xylulose ReductaseGlucoseGlycerolMethanolXylitolMetabolic engineeringPichia pastorisSustainable carbon sourcesXylitol biosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID40059136
PMCPMC11892284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.