Observational studyThe Medical journal of Australia2025
Early cardiovascular collapse after envenoming by snakes in Australia, 2005-2020: an observational study (ASP-31).
Observational study in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sinus bradycardia and acute renal injury secondary to Viperidae snakebite: first case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the frequency, timing, and characteristics of cardiovascular collapse after snakebite in Australia, and the complications of collapse following envenoming. STUDY
designObservational study; analysis of prospectively collected demographic and clinical data. SETTING,
participantsPeople with confirmed snake envenoming recruited to the Australian Snakebite Project at one of 200 participating Australian hospitals, 1 July 2005 - 30 June 2020.
main outcome measuresTime from snakebite to collapse; post-collapse complications (cardiac arrest, seizures, death).
resultsOf 1259 envenomed people, 157 (12%) collapsed within 24 hours of the snakebite; venom-induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC) was determined in all 156 people for whom coagulation testing could be performed. The exact time between bite and collapse was known for 149 people (median, 20 min; interquartile range, 15-30 min; range, 5-115 min); the time exceeded 60 minutes for only two people, each after releasing tight bandages 60 minutes after the bite. The collapse preceded hospital arrival in 132 cases (84%). Brown snake (Pseudonaja spp.) envenoming was the leading cause of collapse (103 cases, 66%). Forty-two collapses (27%) were followed by cardiac arrest, 49 (31%) by seizures (33 without cardiac arrest), and five by apnoea; collapse was associated with hypotension in all 24 people whose blood pressure could be measured at or close to the time of collapse. Twenty-five people who collapsed died (16%), and seven of the envenomed people who did not collapse (0.6%; difference: 15 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 8-21 percentage points). The deaths of 21 of the 25 people who collapsed were immediately associated with the cardiac arrest that followed the collapse; three people who did not have cardiac arrests died later of intracranial haemorrhage, and one of hyperthermia. The proportion of people who had collapsed before reaching hospital was larger for people who died of post-collapse cardiac arrest (13 of 21, 62%) than for those who survived (6 of 21, 28%).
conclusionCollapse after Australian snake envenoming almost always occurred within 60 minutes of the bite, was always accompanied by VICC, and most frequently followed brown snake bites. Poorer outcomes, including cardiac arrest, seizures, and death, were more frequent for people who collapsed than for those who did not. Outcomes for people who collapsed before medical care arrived were poorer than for those who collapsed in hospital or in an ambulance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.