ArticleExperimental neurology2025
Spatiotemporal activation of lumbar sensorimotor networks.
Article in Experimental neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding Overlapping Lower-Limb Afferent Pathways from Human Epidural Spinal Recordings.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) research is primarily conducted using rodent models, which has resulted in significant advances, including novel treatment strategies that promote recovery. Unfortunately, many of these treatments do not have the same efficacy once translated to human clinical trials. Large animal models, such as Yucatan miniature pigs (minipigs), may provide a superior alternative to translating findings to human clinical trials due to their anatomical similarities to humans. However, porcine models are not widely used, which may be due in part to our inadequate understanding of the functional architecture of neural networks in the minipig spinal cord. This study utilized a clinical-grade epidural paddle array implanted over the lumbosacral enlargement of four minipigs. We then mapped the topographical distribution of spinally evoked motor potentials recorded in hindlimb muscles and cord dorsum potentials evoked by sub-motor threshold tibial nerve stimulation. Spatial correlation analysis suggests the motor networks and sensory networks innervated by the tibial nerve are distinct and separate within the minipig lumbosacral spinal cord. Our findings provide foundational knowledge on sensorimotor networks that are functionally diffused among the lumbar enlargement and possess distinct spatiotemporal patterns of activation along the cord for control of motor output and the processing of sensory input. The results reveal critical insights about the variability of electrophysiological measures across animals, offering a foundation for more individualized approaches in future studies. Furthermore, we demonstrate that using an epidural paddle array to map motor responses is a clinically feasible method, though our results highlight the subject-specific nature of these maps and their sensitivity to paddle location and orientation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.