ArticleDermatology and therapy2025
Efficacy and Safety of 611 in Chinese Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Results from a Phase II Trial.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05544591 (A Multi-Centered, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial, to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 611 in Chinese Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-Centered, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial, to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 611 in Chinese Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of IL-4Rα Inhibitors for Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Antibodies to watch in 2026.mAbs · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. 611, a humanized monoclonal antibody, selectively targets the interleukin (IL)-4 receptor alpha, thereby inhibiting the signaling of both interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13. This phase 2 study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 611 in Chinese adults with moderate-to-severe AD.
methodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study was conducted between October 2022 and September 2023. Eligible patients with moderate-to-severe AD were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 611 at a dose of either 300 mg (loading dose of 600 mg) every 2 weeks (Group A) or 300 mg (loading dose of 600 mg) every 4 weeks (Group B), or placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, followed by an 8-week follow-up period. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving at least a 75% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) score at week 16. The safety and pharmacodynamics were also assessed.
resultsAfter 16 weeks of treatment, 60.0% of patients in Group A and 48.8% in Group B achieved EASI-75, both significantly higher than the placebo group (15.6%, p < 0.01). Additionally, 611 at both doses significantly improved the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores, peak pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS), and other efficacy endpoints. Patients receiving 611 demonstrated significant reductions in serum thymus activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) and total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar across all dosage groups. The most common 611-related TEAE is upper respiratory tract infections. No new safety concerns were identified.
conclusion611 demonstrated a high efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05544591.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.