Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40057916›Full record

SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2025

Extended versus limited mesenteric excision in bowel resection for Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

B F Pompeu, P Marcolin, F I L C B Marques, G A da Rocha Soares, A L C E Silva, B D'Andrea Pigossi, S M P de Figueiredo, F B Formiga

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

B F Pompeu *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, Rua Santo Antônio, 50 - Centro, São Caetano do Sul, São Paulo, Brazil. bernardo.pompeu@online.uscs.edu.br.ORCID 0009-0009-2960-3810
P Marcolin *Federal University of the Southern Border, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3241-5545
F I L C B MarquesDepartment of General Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0002-1959-207X
G A da Rocha SoaresMetropolitan University of Santos, Santos, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-3765-3931
A L C E SilvaDepartment of General Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7255-3833
B D'Andrea PigossiDepartment of General Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4757-8953
S M P de FigueiredoDepartment of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2986-8164
F B FormigaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, Rua Santo Antônio, 50 - Centro, São Caetano do Sul, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7225-7145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is ongoing debate regarding the benefits of extended mesenteric excision (EME) versus limited mesenteric excision (LME) in intestinal resection for Crohn's disease (CD). Some studies suggest that EME may reduce surgical recurrence, which is defined as the need for reoperation due to disease complications or insufficient response to therapy, when compared with LME. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare postoperative complications, surgical recurrence, and endoscopic recurrence in patients undergoing EME versus LME for CD.

methodsMEDLINE, Cochrane, the Central Register of Clinical Trials, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched for studies published through April 2024. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q test and I

resultsOne randomized controlled trial (RCT) and five observational studies were included, totaling 4498 patients, of whom 1059 (23.5%) underwent EME and 3439 (76.5%) LME. EME was associated with a lower surgical recurrence rate (5% versus 15%; OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.12-0.84; p = 0.021; I

conclusionsEME was associated with a significant reduction in surgical recurrence compared with LME, without differences in endoscopic recurrence or postoperative complication rates.

Indexed as

ColectomyCrohn DiseaseMesenteryAdultFemaleHumansMaleObservational Studies as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceReoperationTreatment OutcomeCrohn’s diseaseExtended mesenteric excisionLimited mesenteric excisionSurgical recurrence

Identifiers

PMID40057916
PMCPMC11891095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.