ReviewPlanta2025
A multidisciplinary and integrative review of the structural genome and epigenome of Capsicum L. species.
Review in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionWe revised and integrated the genomic and epigenomic data into a comparative Capsicum ideogram, evidencing the advances and future perspectives. Capsicum L. (Solanaceae) genome has been characterized concerning karyotype, nuclear and chromosomal genome size, genome sequencing and physical mapping. In addition, the epigenome has been investigated, showing chromosomal distribution of epimarks in histone amino acids. Genetic and epigenetic discoveries have given light to understanding the structure and organization of the Capsicum "omics". In addition, interspecific and intraspecific similarities and diversities have been identified, characterized and compared in taxonomic and evolutive scenarios. The journey through Capsicum studies allows us to know the 2n = 2x = 24 and 2n = 2x = 26 chromosome numbers, as well as the relatively homomorphic karyotype, and the 1C chromosomal DNA content. In addition, Capsicum "omics" diversity has mainly been evidenced from the nuclear 1C value, as well as from repeatome composition and mapping. Like this, Capsicum provides several opportunities for "omics", ecological, agronomic and conservation approaches, as well as subjects that can be used at different levels of education. In this context, we revisit and integrate Capsicum data about the genome size, karyotype, sequencing and cytogenomics, pointing out the progress and impact of this knowledge in taxonomic, evolutive and agronomic contexts. We also noticed gaps, which can be a focus of further studies. From this multidisciplinary and integrative review, we intend to show the beauty and intrigue of the Capsicum genome and epigenome, as well as the outcomes of these similarities and differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40057910What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.