Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40057825›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2025

CAR T cell therapy for glioblastoma: A review of the first decade of clinical trials.

Sabrina L Begley, Donald M O'Rourke, Zev A Binder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sabrina L BegleyGBM Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Donald M O'RourkeGBM Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Zev A BinderGBM Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: zev.binder@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

Development and validation of an autologous mouse model for the study of immune interactions with glioblastomaR37CA285434 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Zev Ari Binder · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA285434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis and few effective treatment options. Focus has shifted toward using immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, to selectively target tumor antigens and mediate cytotoxic activity within an otherwise immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Between 2015 and 2024, the results of eight completed and two ongoing phase I clinical trials have been published. The majority of studies have treated recurrent GBM patients, although the inter- and intra-patient tumor heterogeneity has been historically challenging to overcome. Molecular targets have included EGFR, HER2, and IL13Rα2 and there has been continued development in improving receptor constructs, identifying novel targets, and adding adjuvant enhancers to increase efficacy. CAR T cells have been safely administered through both peripheral and locoregional routes but with variable clinical and radiographic efficacy. Most trials utilized autologous T cell products to avoid immune rejection yet were unable to consistently show robust engraftment and persistence within patients. Nonetheless, targeted immunotherapies such as CAR T cell therapy remain the next frontier for GBM treatment, and the popularity and complexity of this undertaking is evident in the past, present, and future landscape of clinical trials.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmClinical Trials as TopicHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR T cellschimeric antigen receptor T cellsclinical trialsEGFRglioblastomaIL13Rα2

Identifiers

PMID40057825
PMCPMC12172181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.