ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025
Feasibility of a prospective, longitudinal study of resilience among young military recruits with an embedded laboratory sub-study: the ARMOR pilot trial.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite extensive resilience research with military personnel, progress in developing effective resilience-specific interventions for military service members (MSM) has been limited. To inform the design of effective prevention and intervention strategies, a better understanding of the neurocognitive, behavioral, and social processes associated with resilience is needed. This paper reports on a pilot study testing the feasibility of methods and procedures, to be used in the Advancing Research on Mechanisms of Resilience (ARMOR) longitudinal cohort study. Pilot trial objectives were to evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, retention, and data collection against pre-specified progression criteria for determining whether to proceed with the large-scale study.
methodsThis pilot trial used a pre-test/post-test design with an embedded laboratory sub-study. Participants were young recruits who had recently enlisted in the US Army National Guard and had not yet shipped to Basic Combat Training (BCT). Recruitment and baseline data collection at local armories involved computerized self-report measures and neurocognitive tests. Participants completed a web-based follow-up survey on personal devices after BCT. A subset of participants was recruited to complete laboratory procedures pre- and post-BCT, including clinical interviews and neurobehavioral tasks. To evaluate the feasibility of collecting real-time assessments of military stressors, participants were randomized to receive web-based surveys during BCT.
resultsAmong the 105 military service members approached, 101 (96.2%) were recruited. Baseline data collection and retention methods were considered feasible; the response rate to the follow-up survey was over 70%. Recruitment and data collection for the laboratory sub-study were also considered feasible; more than 90% of participants completed follow-up laboratory visits. The collection of web-based surveys during BCT and computerized neurocognitive testing at follow-up was not considered feasible; the large-scale study will remove these components.
conclusionsProgression to the large-scale trial, with design refinements, was concluded. Lessons learned and recommendations for future research are discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.