ArticleBMC medical education2025
Improvement in clinician confidence in and knowledge of Diabetic Ketoacidosis management following a case-based curriculum in Kenya.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality in low resource settings. Prompt diagnosis and correct management improves outcomes. To improve clinician knowledge and confidence in DKA management, we designed a novel curriculum for training local clinicians in a low-resource setting. This curriculum aligned to international guidelines, adapted for local resources. Our aim was to assess if the curriculum improved clinician knowledge and confidence.
methodsParticipants included physicians and nurses in the Emergency Department (ED) at a tertiary academic center in Nairobi, Kenya. Participants completed pre/post-tests of knowledge, which permitted prospective curriculum evaluation based on the second level Kirkpatrick hierarchy, knowledge retention. The cases focused on local evidence-based DKA management pathways. They were delivered using novel in-person with virtual (recorded) teaching techniques, permitting both conventional and independent learning. Outcome measures related to knowledge improvement were analyzed using independent t-tests; clinician confidence was assessed via self-reported survey and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
results125 clinicians (79.8% nurses and 20.2% physicians) completed pre-training assessment; 104 completed post-training assessment. Prior to training, 53.6% of all trainees reported that they were "highly confident" compared with 61.5% of all trainees post-training (p=0.16). Post-training, there were statistically significant increases in knowledge scores related to DKA diagnosis (14% increase, p=0.03), electrolyte management (41% increase, p<0.0001), fluid administration (28% increase, p=0.01) and insulin administration (24% increase, p=0.01). There was a significant increase in overall clinician knowledge scores with 34.4% (n=43) attaining a knowledge score of 7 or above correct responses out of the 10 cases presented pre-training versus 65.4% n=68 post-training (p<0.0001).
conclusionOur pretest-posttest results demonstrate that our DKA management course improved clinical knowledge among physicians and nurses working in low-resource ED. Future research is underway to evaluate clinical practice changes and patient care outcomes related to this improved knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.