Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40057731›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Human-centered design and maternity care: is this a possible interplay?-a systematic review.

Filipa Landeiro, Mónica Silva, Carolina Veiga E Moura, Catarina Martins, Paula Miller, Sandrina Ferraz, Andréa Paula de Azevedo, Sara Gancho, Luís Rocha, Rui Patrício and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Filipa LandeiroUniversidade Europeia, IADE, Faculdade de Design, Tecnologia e Comunicação, UNIDCOM/IADE, Unidade de Investigação em Design e Comunicação, Av. D. Carlos I, 4, 1200-649, Lisboa, Portugal. filipa.landeiro@gmail.com.
Mónica SilvaDepartamento da Mulher e Medicina Reprodutiva, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Carolina Veiga E MouraDepartamento da Mulher e Medicina Reprodutiva, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Catarina MartinsUniversidade Europeia, IADE, Faculdade de Design, Tecnologia e Comunicação, Av. D. Carlos I, 4, 1200-649, Lisboa, Portugal.
Paula MillerDepartamento da Mulher e Medicina Reprodutiva, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Sandrina FerrazDepartamento da Mulher e Medicina Reprodutiva, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Andréa Paula de AzevedoInstituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Sara GanchoUniversidade Europeia, IADE, Faculdade de Design, Tecnologia e Comunicação, UNIDCOM/IADE, Unidade de Investigação em Design e Comunicação, Av. D. Carlos I, 4, 1200-649, Lisboa, Portugal.
Luís RochaConsultant, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rui PatrícioUniversidade Europeia, IADE, Faculdade de Design, Tecnologia e Comunicação, UNIDCOM/IADE, Unidade de Investigação em Design e Comunicação, Av. D. Carlos I, 4, 1200-649, Lisboa, Portugal.
Inês NunesDepartamento da Mulher e Medicina Reprodutiva, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper argues that putting women at the center of care requires the right balance between adequate clinical care and human-centered design (HCD) approaches. Enhancing their experience during the maternity journey would make it possible to address societal challenges and effectively achieve the humanization of maternity care. Thus, the aim is to investigate the interplay between human-centered design and maternity care through a literature review. MEDLINE (Pubmed), CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched, and twenty-one papers were selected as primary studies according to predefined inclusion criteria and as per agreement of the authors, either from design/social sciences or clinical backgrounds. Studies from eight countries targeting prenatal, childbirth, and/or postnatal care were reviewed, including healthcare professionals and pregnant women as participants. A systematic approach was followed for the papers, and specific attention was paid to socioeconomic and racial issues. The last phase included prototype testing, which involved digital resources development. Creating solutions for the mainstay problems throughout HCD is a helpful tool in surpassing systems' problems and disadvantages, allowing for identifying and accurately targeting healthcare system gaps and maternity care opportunities to achieve a positive and humanized journey.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPatient-Centered CareFemaleHumansPregnancyChildbirth careCo-creationDesignHealthcareHumanizationMaternity care

Identifiers

PMID40057731
PMCPMC11890511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.