Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40057717›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

The effects of clinical crown length on the sagittal movement of maxillary central incisor in clear aligner treatment: a finite element exploration.

Chen Zhou, Zhicai Feng, Jianhan Ren, Haotian Luo, Hio Cheng Ieong, Runze Li, Yangqiao Qing, Yuqing Guo, Bingyan Guo, Zichun Huang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chen Zhou *Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Zhicai Feng *Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Jianhan Ren *Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Haotian LuoHospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Hio Cheng IeongHospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Runze LiHospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Yangqiao QingHospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Yuqing GuoHospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Bingyan GuoHospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Zichun HuangHospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Yang CaoHospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China. caoyang@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Weicai WangHospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China. wangwc3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

China Oral Health Foundation Smile Teenagers Research Fund A2023-014National Natural Science Foundation of China 82001005Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province China 2023A1515030015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mechanism of force application in clear aligner treatment involves wrapping the clinical crowns, suggesting that the size of the clinical crowns may impact tooth movement. The present finite element study aimed to explore the impact of clinical crown length on the sagittal movement of maxillary central incisor in clear aligner treatment.

methodsThe standard maxillary dentition model was developed using computer tomography scanning. Finite element models of the maxillary dentition, alveolar bone, periodontal ligament, and aligners were established. Twelve model groups were divided based on different clinical crown lengths and attachments' position to simulated the tipping and translational movements of the right maxillary central incisor. The dimensions of the short and long clinical crowns were determined based on epidemiological evidence, and appropriate models were constructed by shortening or elongating the normal incisors by 20% along the longitudinal axis of the tooth. Horizontal rectangular attachments were constructed at the clinical crown center of the short, normal and long clinical crowns. These attachments were categorized into four types: no attachment, labial attachment, palatal attachment and labio-palatal attachments. The finite element analysis focused on evaluating the contact pressure distribution on the crown, displacements, rotations, and von Mises stress in PDL of the right maxillary central incisors.

resultsIn tipping movement, the long clinical crown exhibited the highest crown displacement and rotation, enhancing the efficiency. In translational movement, the long clinical crown had the lowest TL/CD value, losing less torque during the crown displacement. However, the short clinical crown had the lowest M

conclusionsClinical crown length has considerable influences on the efficiency, movement behavior, and maximum von Mises stress of the PDL in the sagittal movement of maxillary center incisor in clear aligner treatment. Moreover, attachments also influence the movement efficiency of the incisor.

Indexed as

CrownsFinite Element AnalysisIncisorOrthodontic Appliance DesignTooth CrownTooth Movement TechniquesAlveolar ProcessBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationDental Stress AnalysisHumansMaxillaPeriodontal LigamentStress, MechanicalClear aligner treatmentClinical crown lengthFinite element analysisMaxillary central incisorTooth movement

Identifiers

PMID40057717
PMCPMC11889771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.