Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40057706›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

The influence of maternal gut and vaginal microbiota on gastrointestinal colonization of neonates born vaginally and per caesarean section.

Emma Ronde, Maaike Alkema, Thomas Dierikx, Sam Schoenmakers, Clara Belzer, Tim de Meij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma RondeDivision of Obstetrics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands. e.ronde@erasmusmc.nl.
Maaike AlkemaLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 10, Wageningen, 6703 HB, The Netherlands.
Thomas DierikxDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases & Infection Prevention, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sam SchoenmakersDivision of Obstetrics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands.
Clara BelzerLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 10, Wageningen, 6703 HB, The Netherlands.
Tim de MeijDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly life microbial colonization of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract is crucial for imprinting of the immune system. Vertical transmission of maternal microbes is considered the key source of initial neonatal microbial colonization. We aimed to evaluate the role of the maternal vaginal and rectal microbiota in early neonatal gastrointestinal colonization in vaginally- and caesarean section-born neonates.

methodsMaternal vaginal and rectal swabs were collected shortly before delivery. Neonatal fecal samples were collected at day 0, 7 and 28 postnatally in both vaginally-born (n = 23) and caesarean-section born (n = 40) neonates (total n = 63). All samples were analyzed by 16 S rRNA sequencing. The relative abundances of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) shared between maternal swabs and fecal neonatal samples were compared in vaginally-versus caesarean section-born neonates.

resultsThe median relative abundance of ASVs shared in the maternal rectal and vaginal swabs with all neonatal samples was low (below 10% for rectal or vaginal swabs with any of the three time-points). When focusing on vaginally- versus caesarean section-born neonates, there were no differences in the relative abundance of shared ASVs with the maternal vaginal swabs, and only on day 7 in the rectal swabs (p = 0.002). However, in both delivery routes, the relative abundance of ASV shared with the maternal rectal swab was higher (median 19% in vaginally-born neonates and 2% in caesarean section-born neonates) compared to the relative abundance of the ASVs shared with the maternal vaginal swab (0% for both vaginally- and caesarean section-born neonates) on day 28.

conclusionsWe observed that only a limited amount of ASVs were transferred from maternal rectal and vaginal compartments to the neonatal gastrointestinal tract. ASVs from the maternal gastrointestinal tract contributed to neonatal gut colonization to a greater extent than ASVs from the maternal genital tract at one month of age. Our findings contribute to an increased understanding of factors influencing neonatal gastrointestinal colonization in both caesarean section and vaginal birth, of importance as characteristics of early colonization have been associated with health outcomes later in life.

trial registrationThe original trial is registered with the Dutch Clinical Trial Registry (Trial registration number: NTR6000, https://www.trialregisternl/trial/5845 ) and the study protocol was published online.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractRectumVaginaAdultDelivery, ObstetricFecesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCaesarean sectionColonizationMicrobial transmissionMicrobiotaNeonatal microbiotaSeeding

Identifiers

PMID40057706
PMCPMC11889873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.