SynthesisBMC public health2025
Young people with disabilities and their sexual health: a descriptive review of needs, recommendations and interventions.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, almost 180 million young people aged between 10 and 24 live with disability. They are often perceived as asexual, lacking in sexual desires, or as sexually inadequate. The sexual health of young people with disabilities thus remains a blind spot in health promotion. The aim of this descriptive review was to describe and analyze articles exploring needs, recommendations and interventions for promoting the sexual health (SH) of young people with disabilities.
methodsWe searched the PubMed and PsycINFO databases for international scientific articles on SH needs, recommendations or health promotion interventions for young people with disabilities (aged 10-24), published after 2013. Data were extracted using a standardized grid and analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.
resultsTwenty-one articles were included, encompassing 13 SH interventions, 6 SH need studies, and 2 recommendations studies. Most studies were carried out in the United States (12/21), focusing on intellectual disability (6/21), with 7/21 studies involving parents. Among the needs studies, 2/6 explored the specific needs of young people, while the remaining 4 asked about their difficulties. None of the interventions were designed, co-constructed, or facilitated by young people with disabilities.
conclusionVery few studies have been done to understand the needs and to develop relevant interventions for promoting the sexual health of young people with disabilities. Research with rigorous methodologies is still required to better understand needs and to intervene as relevantly as possible. To this end, participatory research would be a valuable methodology, as it involves target audiences in the various stages of research. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023421365.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.