ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Co-design and clinician evaluation of resources to address weight stigma in antenatal care.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWeight stigma is a commonly reported experience in maternity care that negatively impacts the health of mothers and their babies. Knowledge to inform weight stigma reduction efforts in antenatal care is urgently required. This study aimed to co-design weight stigma reduction resources in antenatal care and evaluate clinician perspectives of the resources regarding their relevance to practice, strengths, and areas for improvement.
methodsWe conducted a five-phase co-design project involving consumers (n = 8) and clinicians (midwives n = 16, obstetrician n = 1), with outputs from each stage informing the next: (1) engaging with key stakeholders; (2) prioritising the voices of lived experience through a consumer stories video; (3) three co-design workshops to inform resource development; (4) resource production; and (5) qualitative evaluation of the resources. The co-developed resources were evaluated via interview where clinicians viewed or listened to the resources and described their engagement and satisfaction with the resources, their relevance to practice, and perspectives on the strengths, areas for improvement, and feasibility for achieving the resources' intended goal. Transcripts were analysed using descriptive thematic analysis.
resultsWe produced a set of evidence-based resources co-designed by consumers and clinicians including a consumer video designed to elicit empathy about lived experiences of weight stigma in maternity care, images representing women with diverse body sizes for use in clinic waiting rooms, a short podcast to raise awareness of weight stigma in maternity care, and signposts for the antenatal clinic to prompt clinicians to consider weight stigma in everyday clinical interactions. Clinicians who saw the resources reported that they were valuable and relevant to practice and were important and helpful introductory materials to the issue of weight stigma. Pragmatic examples of reducing weight stigma in clinical interactions were requested.
conclusionsMaternity care clinicians have an appetite to improve their learning opportunities to tackle weight stigma in practice. Further refinement of the resources, evaluation of the effectiveness at changing clinician behaviour, and implementation into health services are logical next steps. Reducing women's experiences of weight stigma should lead to better care and better pregnancy outcomes for larger bodied women. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.