ArticleBMC genomics2025
Phylogenetic analysis of Asiatic species in the tropical genus Beilschmiedia (Lauraceae).
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Plastome Analysis ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genomes of ThreeCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The tropial genus Beilschmiedia, comprising over 250 species worldwide, includes approximately 40 species distributed in the northern tropical forests of Asia. However, the phylogenetic relationships among these Asiatic Beilschmiedia species remain incompletely understood. In this study, we sequenced and assembled complete chloroplast genomes from six Asiatic Beilschmiedia species, including five from China and one from Indonesia. The genomes range in size from 158,275 to 158,620 bp and exhibit a typical quadripartite structure, similar to other basal Lauraceae species. We identified 116 to 122 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and 19 to 28 dispersed repeats within the genomes. The relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of 79 protein-coding genes exhibited minimal variation. Notably, the boundary genes rpl23 and ycf1 displayed varying degrees of expansion and contraction, along with incomplete replication phenomena. Using a sliding window approach, we constructed a coalescent tree with ASTRAL software to analyze the phylogenetic relationships. The resulting main topology was highly consistent with the Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses, clearly dividing the Asiatic core Beilschmiedia into two distinct groups: Group A and Group B. Group A showed an extremely low nucleotide diversity (π) value of 0.00063, while Group B exhibited 2.79-fold higher diversity. The highly variable regions trnS-trnG and rpl32-trnL are proposed as molecular markers for distinguishing between Groups A and B. Furthermore, we identified seven additional highly variable regions: ndhF, ndhF-rpl32, rpl2, rpl2-trnH, rpl32, rps15-ycf1, and ycf1. These regions may serve as potential molecular markers for the Asiatic Beilschmiedia species. These findings provide new insights into the phylogenetic relationships among Asiatic Beilschmiedia species, highlighting the potential of specific molecular markers in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.