ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025
Regulatory, Translational, and Operational Considerations for the Incorporation of Biomarkers in Drug Development.
Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stabilized adaptive states in microbiome-human integrated physiology: reframing health and chronic disease as symbiotic biological states.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Targeting the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: Emerging Nanomedicine Approaches for Neurodegenerative Diseases.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Review
- Shortened Cortical Silent Period in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- From Molecular Networks to Medicines: Targeting Complexity in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Therapy.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Biomarkers of Coagulation Disorders-Where to from Here?Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Epigenetics: the master switch of nasopharyngeal carcinoma invasion and metastasis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- From Biomarkers to Biosensors: Modern Approaches for the Detection of Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs).Biosensors · 2025Review
- Innovations in Alzheimer's disease diagnostic technologies: clinical prospects of novel biomarkers, multimodal integration, and non-invasive detection.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiomarkers are an integral component in the drug development paradigm. According to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a biomarker is "a defined characteristic that is measured as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or biological responses to an exposure or intervention, including therapeutic intervention" (FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group. BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (US); 2016-. Glossary. 2016 [Updated 2021 Nov 29, cited 2024 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK338448/ Co-published by National Institutes of Health (US), Bethesda (MD)). The European Medicines Agency (EMA) defines a biomarker as "an objective and quantifiable measure of a physiological process, pathological process or response to a treatment (excluding measurements of how an individual feels or functions" European Medicines Agency (EMA). Biomaker. 2020a. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/glossary-terms/biomarker#:~:text=Biomarker-,Biomarker,an%20individual%20feels%20or%20functions . Several clinical biomarkers are well-documented and have been used routinely for decades in health care settings and have long been accepted as valid endpoints for drug approval (for example, blood pressure measurement as a biomarker for cardiovascular health) (European Medicines Agency (EMA). Assessment report, TAGRISSO. 2016. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/tagrisso-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf . Accessed 15 Apr 2024). Recently, novel biomarkers have been identified and validated to accelerate developing innovative therapies indicated for serious human diseases, for example targeted/immune therapies of cancer (Chen in Med Drug Discov 21:100174, 2024). As indicators of the efficacy of new pharmacological treatments or therapeutic interventions, biomarkers can improve clinical trial efficacy and reduce uncertainty in regulatory decision making (Bakker et al. in Clin Pharmacol Ther 112:69-80, 2022; Califf in Exp Biol Med 243:213-221, 2018; Parker et al. in Cancer Med 10:1955-1963, 2021). METHODOLOGY: This article describes case studies of recent drug approvals that successfully leveraged validated and non-validated biomarkers (i.e., tofersen for the neurodegenerative disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in adults; and osimertinib for treatment of patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)).
conclusionsBest practices for biomarker selection and strategies for health authority biomarker qualification programs are presented along with an overview of current limitations and challenges to optimizing biomarker applications along the drug development continuum from regulatory, translational, and operational perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40057669What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.