ArticleDysphagia2025
Association Between the Intensity and Frequency of Swallowing Rehabilitation and Oral Intake at Discharge in Older Patients with Acute Post-stroke Dysphagia.
Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Stroke Dysphagia: Moving Toward Evidence-Based, Recovery-Oriented Systems of Care.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Factors for Oral Intake Recovery in Acute Illness Patients With Dysphagia: A Prospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study aimed to clarify the concurrent effects of intensity and frequency of early swallowing rehabilitation for post-stroke dysphagia. Using data from acute-care hospitals included in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2020 and March 2021, we identified patients aged ≥65 years with dysphagia after acute stroke on admission who received swallowing rehabilitation within three days of hospitalization. Swallowing rehabilitation within seven days of hospitalization, starting from admission, was categorized into four types according to intensity (long/short per day) and frequency (high/low proportion of days performed). The primary outcomes were presence of dysphagia and recovery of total oral intake at discharge. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess the effects of rehabilitation intensity and frequency, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. Of the 4,669 patients with post-stroke dysphagia, 913 underwent swallowing rehabilitation within three days of hospitalization. The proportions of patients with dysphagia and total oral intake at discharge were 80% and 47%, respectively. The intensity and frequency of swallowing rehabilitation were not associated with dysphagia at discharge. Higher intensity or higher frequency was associated with total oral intake at discharge (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]:1.62 [0.93-2.81], 2.00 [1.11-3.60], and 2.75 [1.59-4.76] for low-intensity and high-frequency, high-intensity and low-frequency, and high-intensity and high-frequency groups, respectively). This nationwide study showed that the intensity and frequency of acute-phase swallowing rehabilitation were not associated with recovery from dysphagia after a stroke. However, they were associated with an improved oral intake at discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40057664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.