SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025
Comparison of the Hinotori surgical robot with the da Vinci robotic system in urologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Modifying Hinotori Surgical Robot System on the Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective is to investigate the outcomes of the Hinotori Surgical Robotic System (HSRS) for urological surgery and to analyze the variation in perioperative performance between the HSRS and the da Vinci surgical robot. Multiple databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science were comprehensibly retrieved to screen studies that applied HSRS to urologic surgery and compared it with the da Vinci system. The results were combined and analyzed using estimated ratio of ratios (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD). Eight studies with 740 patients were included. Among the baseline characteristics of patients in both groups, all outcomes showed similarity. In urologic surgery, the HSRS cohort experienced a longer operative time (WMD = 8.85, 95% Cl (1.73, 15.97), p < 0.05) and a relatively longer use of the robotic system (WMD = 10.77, 95% Cl [1.09, 20.44], p < 0.05), as well as a notable increase in console time (WMD = 20.99, 95% Cl 95% Cl [8.24, 33.75], p < 0.05). However, estimated blood loss, length of hospitalization, rate of severe complications, and rate of positive margins did not show statistical differences. In urologic surgery, HSRS has a longer operative time, robot system usage time, and console time, but its perioperative results are similar to the Da Vinci system. HSRS shows good clinical promise, however, further long-term data studies are needed to prove it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40057638What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.